|
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Description
Graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA) spectrometry is a highly sensitive spectroscopic technique that provides excellent detection limits for measuring concentrations of metals in aqueous
and solid samples.
Typical
Uses
GFAA has been
used primarily in the field for the analysis of metals in water. GFAA could
be used to determine metals in soil, but the sample preparation for metals in
soil is extensive and is not practical for field applications.
GFAA cannot be
described as a truly field portable instrument. GFAA instruments are extremely
sensitive and therefore, must be operated in a clean, climate controlled environment.
This can be difficult but not impossible to achieve in a field environment.
In addition, the 220-volt electrical power requirement often precludes remote
operation. However, GFAA is an example of “taking the laboratory to the field.”
Miniaturization of electronics has significantly reduced instrument size and
weight, making it easier to use the instrument in a field laboratory.
Theory
of Operation
In atomic absorption
(AA) spectrometry, light of a specific wavelength is passed through the atomic
vapor of an element of interest, and measurement is made of the attenuation
of the intensity of the light as a result of absorption. Quantitative analysis
by AA depends on: (1) accurate measurement of the intensity of the light and
(2) the assumption that the radiation absorbed is proportional to atomic concentration.
Samples to be analyzed
by AA must be vaporized or atomized, typically by using a flame or graphite
furnace. The graphite furnace is an electrothermal atomizer system that can
produce temperatures as high as 3,000°C. The heated graphite furnace provides
the thermal energy to break chemical bonds within the sample and produce free
ground-state atoms. Ground-state
atoms then are capable of absorbing energy, in the form of light, and are elevated
to an excited state. The amount of light energy absorbed increases as the concentration
of the selected element increases.
GFAA has been used
primarily for analysis of low concentrations of metals in samples of water.
GFAA can be used to determine concentrations of metals in soil, but the sample
preparation for metals in soil is somewhat extensive and may require the use
of a mobile laboratory. The more sophisticated GFAAs have a number of lamps
and therefore are capable of simultaneous and automatic determinations for more
than one element.
Logistical needs
include reagents for preparation and analysis of samples, matrix modifiers,
a cooling system, and a 220-volt source of electricity. In addition, many analytical
components of the GFAA system require significant space, which typically is
provided by a mobile laboratory. A tabletop GFAA spectrometer and data processor
are pictured above.
System
Components
GFAA spectrometry
instruments have the following basic features: 1. a source of light (lamp) that
emits resonance line radiation; 2. an atomization chamber (graphite
tube) in which the sample is vaporized; 3. a monochromator for selecting
only one of the characteristic wavelengths (visible or ultraviolet) of the element
of interest; 4. a detector, generally a photomultiplier tube (light detectors
that are useful in low-intensity applications), that measures the amount of
absorption; 5. a signal processor-computer system (strip chart recorder, digital
display, meter, or printer). Click to view a schematic
diagram of the basic components of a GFAA system.
Mode
of Operation
Most currently
available GFAAs are fully controlled from a personal computer that has Windows-compatible
software. Aqueous samples should be acidified (typically with nitric acid) to
a pH of 2.0 or less. Discoloration in a sample may indicate that metals are
present in the sample. For example, a greenish color may indicate a high nickel
content, or a bluish color may indicate a high copper content. A good rule to
follow is to analyze clear samples first, and then analyze colored samples.
It may be necessary to dilute highly colored samples before they are analyzed.
After the instrument
has warmed up and been calibrated, a small aliquot (usually less than 100 microliters
(µL) and typically 20 µL) is placed, either manually or through an automated
sampler, into the opening in the graphite tube. Click to see a cross-sectional
view of a graphite tube
The sample is vaporized in the heated graphite tube; the amount of light energy
absorbed in the vapor is proportional to atomic concentrations. Analysis of
each sample takes from 1 to 5 minutes, and the results for a sample is the average
of triplicate analysis.
Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) are available for:
Graphite tubes
must be changed after every 200 to 800 burns because they become pitted and
produce data that are only poorly reproducible, and results in a loss of sensitivity.
The sample must
be diluted if the absorbence is outside the calibration range. GFAA has a smaller
linear concentration range than flame AA or inductively coupled plasma (ICP)
spectrometry.
Target
Analytes
No data available
Performance
Specs
Performance
specs include information on interferences, detection limits, calibration, sample
preparation, quality control, and precision and accuracy.
Interferences
The GFAA technique
is subject to chemical, spectral, and ionization interferences. The composition
of the sample matrix typically has the largest effect on the results of the
analysis. Chemical interferences occur when the atoms are not completely free
or in their ground state. Spectral interferences occur when atomic or molecular
species other than the element being analyzed absorb energy at the wavelength
of interest. Ionization interferences occur when the furnace causes complete
removal of electrons from an atom, thereby lowering the concentration of ground-state
atoms available to absorb light.
A serial dilution
technique may be used to help verify the absence of chemical and spectral interference.
In cases in which interference is suspected, samples should be treated in one
or more of the following ways: (1) samples should be diluted and reanalyzed
successively to determine whether the interference can be eliminated, (2) matrix
modifiers should be added, or (3) the sample should be analyzed by the method
of standard additions. It is common practice to add matrix modifiers to all
samples to compensate for potential chemical and spectral interferences.
Detection Limits
Numerous metals can be analyzed by GFAA, as long as their atoms can be vaporized in the graphite
furnace. Such elements include aluminum, arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium, calcium,
chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, lithium, magnesium, manganese, mercury,
molybdenum, nickel, potassium, selenium, silicon, silver, sodium, titanium,
terbium, vanadium, ytterbium, and zinc. Click to view a table showing the typical
detection limits for some of the metals listed
above. Detection limits can be very low with GFAA analyses (below most of the
maximum contaminant levels [MCL] for drinking water established by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and usually are 10 to 100 times lower
than the detection limits for analyses by flame AA or ICP for the same element.
Calibration
Continued calibration
of the instrument is a component of the overall quality control plan and should
be performed by analyzing one mid-concentration standard after every 10 analyses.
The relative
percent difference (RPD) between the initial calibration and the
continuing calibration should be less than 15 percent.
Sample Preparation
Samples are analyzed
in triplicate, but it only takes about 5 minutes for sample analysis. Water
samples should be acidified with nitric acid to a pH of less than 2. If
dissolved metals analysis is required, the water samples should be filtered
through a 0.45 micrometer (m) filter. If
the water samples are very turbid, they should be centrifuged prior to analysis
or allowed to settle. To
alleviate interferences, matrix modifiers should be added. The
water samples have a holding time of 6 months after they are preserved. In the
field, most water samples are analyzed within a few hours after collection.
Quality Control
Method blanks are
analyzed with each batch of 20 samples analyzed. Method blanks monitor laboratory-induced
contaminants or interferences. A method blank must not contain any analyte in
a concentration higher than the practical quantitation limit.
Matrix spike (MS)
and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples are analyzed to evaluate the efficiency
of the sample preparation, matrix effect, and the precision of the analysis.
MS-MSDs are prepared with each batch of 20 samples. The advisory control limit
range for spike recovery is 50 to 150 percent. The advisory control limit for
RPD in water samples is 25 percent.
Laboratory control
samples (LCS) are used to evaluate the accuracy of the analysis. The LCSs are
obtained from outside sources and contain known amounts of metals. The values
obtained by analysis of the LCSs are compared with the known true values. The
supplier of the LCSs usually provides control limits. The results obtained should
fall within the published range of acceptance values. When no control limits
are provided, a range of 50 to 150 percent should be used.
Precision and Accuracy
Contamination of samples can be a major source of analytical error because of the extremely low
detection limits achieved with GFAA spectrometry. The work area used for sample
preparation must be kept clean. That requirement is particularly important in
a mobile field laboratory, where it is easy for airborne dust to contaminate
the analytical equipment and glassware.
Other standard analytical practices include:
- Use of precleaned glassware or washing of the glassware in acid
- Use of trace-metal-grade pipette tips
- Use of trace-metal-grade distilled, deionized water and nitric acid
- Prevention of accumulation of dust in the autosampler cups
Advantages
The advantages
of GFAA spectrometry include:
- Greater sensitivity
and detection limits than other methods
- Direct analysis
of some types of liquid samples
- Low spectral
interference
- Very small sample
size
Limitations
The limitations
of GFAA spectrometry include:
- Longer analysis
time than flame AA or ICP analysis
- Limited dynamic
range
- High matrix
interference
- No true field-portability,
with a mobile laboratory setup usually required
- 220-volt power
source required
Cost Data
GFAA costs vary significantly. Instrument design and accessories affect instrument prices. Manufacturers
listed below should be contacted directly for cost information.
Verification/Evaluation Reports
Verification of the performance of site characterization and field analytical technologies is
conducted through a variety of programs. Evaluation and verification reports
from EPA's Superfund Innovative Technologies Evaluation (SITE) Measuring and
Monitoring Program, EPA's Environmental Technology Verification Program (ETV)
program, along with links to certification statements from California EPA's
(CalEPA) California Environmental Technology Certification Program, are provided
below.
Superfund
Innovative Technologies Evaluation (SITE) Measuring and Monitoring Program
The SITE Demonstration Program encourages the development and implementation
of innovative treatment technologies for (1) remediation of hazardous waste
sites and (2) monitoring and measurement. In the SITE Demonstration Program,
the technology is field-tested on hazardous waste materials. Engineering and
cost data on the innovative technologies are gathered so that potential users
can assess the technology's applicability to a particular site. Data collected
during the field demonstration are used to assess the performance of the technology,
the potential need for pre- and post-treatment processing of the waste, applicable
types of wastes and waste matrices, potential operating problems, and approximate
capital and operating costs.
No reports available for this technology
EPA's
Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program
EPA's Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program verifies the performance
of innovative technologies. ETV was created to substantially accelerate the
entrance of new environmental technologies into the domestic and international
marketplaces. ETV verifies commercialized, private sector technologies. After
the technology has been tested, the companies will receive a verification report
that they can use in marketing their products. The results of the testing also
are available on the Internet.
No reports available for this technology
California
EPA's California Environmental Technology Certification Program
CalEPA's environmental technology certification program
is a voluntary program that provides participating technology developers, manufacturers,
and vendors an independent, recognized third-party evaluation of the performance
of new and mature environmental technologies. Developers and manufacturers define
quantitative performance claims for their technologies and provide supporting
documentation; CalEPA reviews that information and, when necessary, conducts
additional testing to verify the claims. The technologies, equipment, and products
that are proven to work as claimed are given official state certification. The
certification program is voluntary and self-supporting. Companies participating
in the program pay the costs of the evaluation and certification of their technologies.
Technologies that have been certified through this program are listed below. Links are provided
to the web sites that provide the Certified Environmental Technology Transfer
Advisory and Certification Notice for the technologies.
No reports available for this technology
Disclaimer
http://www.clu-in.org/char/technologies/graphite.cfm
Page Last Modified: November 22, 2006

|