Air Sparging◊ Bioreactor Landfills
◊ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents
◊ Bioventing and Biosparging
◊ Electrokinetics: Electric Current Technologies
◊ Fracturing
◊ Ground-Water Circulating Wells
◊ In Situ Flushing
◊ In Situ Oxidation
◊ Multi-Phase Extraction
◊ Natural Attenuation
◊ Permeable Reactive Barriers
◊ Phytoremediation
◊ Remediation Optimization
◊ Soil Vapor Extraction
◊ Soil Washing
◊ Solvent Extraction
◊ Thermal Treatment: Ex Situ
◊ Thermal Treatment: In Situ
|
|
Application
Advanced Fuel Hydrocarbon Remediation National Test Location: In Situ Air Sparging System
1997. NFESC-TDS-2029-ENV (REV), ADA323452, 3 pp.
Air Sparging and Soil Vapor Extraction at Landfill 4, Fort Lewis, Washington: Cost & Performance Report
1998. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. 44 pp.
Air Sparging/ High Vacuum Extraction to Remove Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater and Soil
1998. J.M. Phelan (Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM); M.D. Gilliat (Babcock and Wilcox, OH). SAND--98-2016C, NTIS: DE99000593, 12 pp.
At the DOE Mound facility in Miamisburg, Ohio, an air sparging and high vacuum extraction system was installed as an alternative to a containment pump and treat system. Technical data are presented on the operating characteristics of the system. Available through the DOE Information Bridge.
Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: Lessons Learned about In Situ Air Sparging at the Denison Avenue Site, Cleveland, OH
EPA 600-R-95-040, 1994. PB95-188082, 110 pp.
Combined Air Sparge and Bioremediation of an Underground Coal Gasification Site
1996. J.R. Covell; M.H. Thomas. DOE/MC/31346--97/C0830, NTIS: DE97054045, 27 pp.
In 1996, EG&G Technical Services of West Virginia (TSWV) Inc. successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of combined air sparge and biostimulation technology to remediate benzene contamination at a former underground coal gasification (UCG) test site in northeastern Wyoming. Benzene concentration reductions greater than 80% were observed two months after demonstration operations were suspended. Available through the DOE Information Bridge.
Density-Driven Groundwater Sparging at Amcor Precast Ogden, Utah: Cost & Performance Report
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.
A Field-Scale Demonstration of Air Sparging to Remediate Tritiated Fluids
1996. C.E. Russell; D.R. Gillespie; S.L. Hokett; J.D. Donithan, Nevada Univ., Las Vegas, NV, Desert Research Inst. DOE/NV/11508--09, NTIS: DE97003546, 48 pp.
Two pilot field-scale studies were conducted in 1996 to evaluate the potential of air sparging to remediate tritiated fluids. The results of the two experiments demonstrated that air sparging of tritium is a viable process in the field.
In Situ Air Stripping Using Horizontal Wells Demonstrated at U.S. Department of Energy M Area, Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC: Innovative Technology Summary Report
1995. DOE/EM--0269, 32 pp.
In Situ Air Stripping of Contaminated Groundwater at the U.S. Department of Energy's Savannah River Site, A/M Area, Aiken, South Carolina: Cost & Performance Report
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.
In Situ Enhanced Source Removal
1999. Enfield, Carl (U.S. EPA), and others. EPA 600-C-99-002.
This report assesses the results of demonstrations of the following technologies: co-solvent solubilization, co-solvent mobilization, surfactant solubilization, surfactant mobilization, micro-emulsions, macromolecular complexation, steam injection, air sparging, and soil vapor extraction.
Multi-Site Air Sparging
2002. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH. 115 pp.
Describes the results of 10 air sparging demonstrations completed at DoD facilities to implement and evaluate the Air Sparging Design Paradigm.
Push-Pull Tests for Evaluating the Aerobic Cometabolism of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons: ESTCP Cost and Performance Report
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, NTIS: ADA468544, 46 pp, 2006
Single-well push/pull test methods were demonstrated at Fort Lewis Logistics Center (using toluene as a cometabolic growth substrate) and McClellan AFB (during cometabolic air sparging with propane as a growth substrate) to determine (1) the transport characteristics of nutrients, substrates, and CAHs and their transformation products; (2) the capability of indigenous microorganisms to utilize selected substrates and transform targeted contaminants and surrogate compounds; (3) the rates of substrate utilization and contaminant transformation; and (4) the combinations of injected nutrients and substrates that maximize rates of contaminant transformation.
Removal of MTBE from Drinking Water Using Air Stripping: Case Studies
R. Deeb, E. Hawley, A. Stocking, M. Kavanaugh, A. Flores, S. Sue, D. Spiers, M. Wooden, G. Crawford, and G. Garcia.
National Water Research Institute, NWRI-2006-03, 92 pp, 2006
Design, performance, and cost summary data were collected from nine packed-tower and low-profile air stripper treatment systems that address MTBE contamination in ground-water supplies in the 1990s to develop a series of cost and reliability curves and assess the accuracy of two models designed to predict the cost and performance of packed-tower and low-profile air strippers. Results indicate that a variety of different treatment train configurations can use air strippers successfully to remove a range of MTBE concentrations (i.e., from 10 to 2,400,000 ug/L). Removal efficiencies ranged from 65% to greater than 99.9%. The commercially available models predicted actual removal efficiencies within 15%.
Source Reduction Effectiveness at Fuel-Contaminated Sites. Technical Summary Report
2000. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, 125 pp.
This report summarizes field performance studies of the following source reduction technologies: air sparging, bioventing, biosparging, soil vapor extraction, multi-phase extraction, and excavation.
Subsurface Volatilization and Ventilation System (SVVS): SITE Technology Capsule
EPA 540-R-94-529a, 1995. 7 pp.
Use of Cometabolic Air Sparging to Remediate Chloroethene-Contaminated Groundwater Aquifers. ESTCP Cost and Performance Report
2001. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), Arlington, VA. 73 pp.
Work Plan for C-Sparge® Demonstration Test at Building C-752-A Area Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Paducah, Kentucky
2001. Washington Group International, Cleveland, OH. Prepared for Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, 172 pp.
Disclaimer
http://www.clu-in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/Air%5F
Last updated on Tuesday, November 6, 2007