Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

information

We are making some changes to CLU-IN. If you have any feedback or questions, please contact us.

Share |
Connect | Archived Internet Seminars and Podcasts News Feeds (RSS) TechDirect and Newsletters

Characterization, Cleanup, and Revitalization of Mining Sites

Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water Profile

Technology: Aquafix

Report
FINAL SILVER DYKE ADIT AQUAFIX TREATMENT PILOT TEST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM; Carpenter-Snow Creek Mining District National Priorities List Site Supplemental Studies for the Remedial Investigation Cascade County, Montana
Source or source contact: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/100008853.pdf
Publication Date: November 2017
Document Type: PDF
Author: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Prepared for: Montana Department of Environmental Quality Remediation Division and U.S. EPA Region 8

Site Identifiers

Site Name: CARPENTER SNOW CREEK MINING DISTRICT
EPA CERCLA ID: MT0001096353
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: SDAQ1
Site Status: Post operations
Technology Tested: Aquafix (water powered quicklime application system)
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Aquafix
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: No pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Adit
Treatment Train? (Y/N): N
Specific Component for Performance Data: No pre- or post-treatment
Technology Requirements: Valve settings had to be adjusted to provide correct flow rate to avoid quicklime overdosing.
Geographic conditions/constraints: Cascade County, Montana
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: October 2016 - March 2017

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:30,100
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):17.53

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 32,152
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.84
DO:2.63 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.64 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:281 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,017 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 162,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:157,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):3.09

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 143,227
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.84
DO:2.63 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.64 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:281 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,017 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 159,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3,350
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.89

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 140,905
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.67
DO:2.84 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:347 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:38.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,780
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3,060
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-10.07

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,138
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.27
DO:2.78 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.62 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:321 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,287 µS/cm
Other Parameters:37.8 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,960
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:62
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.91

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,213
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.67
DO:2.84 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:347 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:38.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,270
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,280
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.79

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,270
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,090
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):14.17

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 879
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:728
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):17.18

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 788
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.27
DO:2.78 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.62 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:321 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,287 µS/cm
Other Parameters:37.8 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 886
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:112
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):87.36

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 785
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.66
DO:2.7 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:315 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,816 µS/cm
Other Parameters:32.4 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 661
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:477
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):27.84

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 552
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 661
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:397
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):39.94

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 35
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 335
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:322
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):3.88

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 297
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.66
DO:2.7 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:315 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,816 µS/cm
Other Parameters:32.4 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 338
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:36.2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):89.29

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 295
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.66
DO:2.7 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:315 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,816 µS/cm
Other Parameters:32.4 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 243
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:173
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):28.81

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 243
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:140
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):42.39

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 15,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:12,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):15.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 10,368
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.27
DO:2.78 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.62 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:321 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,287 µS/cm
Other Parameters:37.8 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 14,900
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,960
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):86.85

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 10,494
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.82
DO:2.69 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.69 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:296 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,886 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5,820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):20.96

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5,820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4,030
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):30.76

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 55,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4,510
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.89

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 38,955
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.62
DO:2.86 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:295 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,771 µS/cm
Other Parameters:36.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 30,800
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:23,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):24.68

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 26,400
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:16,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):38.64

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.6
DO:2.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:309 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,749 µS/cm
Other Parameters:29.3 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 127,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:92,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):27.56

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 43
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Available

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 34
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.65
DO:4.78 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.5 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:307 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,772 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 16
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Available

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 669
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:5.03
DO:3.21 mg/L
Water Temperature:6.7 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:238 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,853 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 127,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:71,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):43.62

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 371
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:344
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):7.28

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 327
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.66
DO:2.7 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:315 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,816 µS/cm
Other Parameters:32.4 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 374
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:26
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.05

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 323
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.66
DO:2.7 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:315 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,816 µS/cm
Other Parameters:32.4 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 262
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:182
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):30.53

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 262
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:149
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):43.13

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 977
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:434
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):55.58

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 908
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.44
DO:3.58 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.47 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:250 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,809 µS/cm
Other Parameters:39.3 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 950
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:51.6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.57

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 849
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.82
DO:2.69 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.69 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:296 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,886 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 806
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:558
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):30.77

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 765
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.73
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.25

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.75
DO:3.63 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.49 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:218 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,983 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 3,140
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Available

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 3,066
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.7
DO:2.64 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.64 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:269 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,793 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2,750
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):2.48

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,704
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.87
DO:3.18 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.62 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:269 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,504 µS/cm
Other Parameters:48.8 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 178,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:175,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):1.69

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 149,545
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.84
DO:2.63 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.64 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:281 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,017 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 175,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:166,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):5.14

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 145,476
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.84
DO:2.63 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.64 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:281 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,017 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.5 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 132,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:87,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):33.41

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.98
DO:3.61 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.31 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:229 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,736 µS/cm
Other Parameters:24.6 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 128,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:118,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):7.81

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:3.87
DO:3.18 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.62 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:269 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,504 µS/cm
Other Parameters:48.8 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Characteristics of water from the adit prior to lime addition (baseline)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Report
FINAL SILVER DYKE ADIT AQUAFIX TREATMENT PILOT TEST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM; Carpenter-Snow Creek Mining District National Priorities List Site Supplemental Studies for the Remedial Investigation Cascade County, Montana
Source or source contact: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/100008853.pdf
Publication Date: November 2017
Document Type: PDF
Author: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Prepared for: Montana Department of Environmental Quality Remediation Division and U.S. EPA Region 8

Site Identifiers

Site Name: CARPENTER SNOW CREEK MINING DISTRICT
EPA CERCLA ID: MT0001096353
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: SDAQ2
Site Status: Post operations
Technology Tested: Aquafix (water powered quicklime application system)
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Aquafix
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: No pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Adit
Treatment Train? (Y/N): N
Specific Component for Performance Data: No pre- or post-treatment
Technology Requirements: Valve settings had to be adjusted to provide correct flow rate to avoid quicklime overdosing.
Geographic conditions/constraints: Cascade County, Montana
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: October 2016 - March 2017

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:92 92
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 96.46

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 26
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration374
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)93.05

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND ND
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 332
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.25

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational; ND - non-detect (detection limit is < 5)

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 3,920
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,590
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-51.35

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,999
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 662
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,540
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)73.94

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 202
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21 21
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,660
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.21

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 89.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 856
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration861
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)0.58

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 112
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration886
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)87.36

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.6 4.6
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 809
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.43

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:< 2 < 2
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 812
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.88

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.10%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:12.04
DO:5.12 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.94 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,795 µS/cm
Other Parameters:14.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 322
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration335
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)3.88

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 206
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 36
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration338
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)89.35

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 10
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2.68 2.68
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 298
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.10

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.39 1.39
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 298
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.53

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.80%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:12.04
DO:5.12 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.94 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,795 µS/cm
Other Parameters:14.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 12,800
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration13,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)6.57

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 6,823
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,810
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration14,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)87.07

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 297
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:55 55
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 13,800
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.60

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:12 12
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 14,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.92

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.20%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:12.04
DO:5.12 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.94 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,795 µS/cm
Other Parameters:14.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 38,200
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration41,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)7.28

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 26,954
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:10.92
DO:8.16 mg/L
Water Temperature:3.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:180 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,728 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 4,390
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration32,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)86.53

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,629
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:125 125
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.65

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:204 204
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.31

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 95.50%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:9.6
DO:6.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.02 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:122 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,787 µS/cm
Other Parameters:166 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 122,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration136,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)10.29

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 83,951
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:10.92
DO:8.16 mg/L
Water Temperature:3.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:180 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,728 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 50,700
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration135,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)62.44

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 8,446
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.04
DO:1.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:0.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:172 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,674 µS/cm
Other Parameters:174 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,290 1,290
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 151,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.15

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:58 58
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 143,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.96

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 93.90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:12.04
DO:5.12 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.94 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,795 µS/cm
Other Parameters:14.1 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 344
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration371
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)7.28

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 266
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND ND
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 286–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.1 - 99.2

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 97.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.04–10.92
DO:1.05–8.16 mg/L
Water Temperature:0.06–5.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:109–180 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,389–2,817 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–250 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational; ND - non-detect (detection limit is < 5)

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,460
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration929
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-57.16

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 386
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.04
DO:1.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:0.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:172 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,674 µS/cm
Other Parameters:174 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 48
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration889
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)94.60

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 15
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:12 12
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 855
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 98.60

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.13 1.13
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 871
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.87

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 98.30%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:9.6
DO:6.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.02 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:122 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,787 µS/cm
Other Parameters:166 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 3,150
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration3,120
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-0.96

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,430 1,430
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 3,080
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 53.57

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:10.92
DO:8.16 mg/L
Water Temperature:3.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:180 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,728 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,520
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration30
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-4966.67

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:18 18
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 42
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 57.14

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 153,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration152,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-0.66

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 102,624
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 25,800
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration156,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)83.46

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 4,942
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): October 2016 - March 2017

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.88
DO:5.6 mg/L
Water Temperature:5.71 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,951 µS/cm
Other Parameters:649 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,240 1,240
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 152,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.18

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:11.54
DO:5.71 mg/L
Water Temperature:7.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:32 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,032 µS/cm
Other Parameters:9.7 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:356 356
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 145,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.75

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient):  

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient):  

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): 96.70%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:9.6
DO:6.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:8.02 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:122 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,787 µS/cm
Other Parameters:166 (turbidity) NTU

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Operation of the Aquafix system requires 1 or 2 weekly visits. The size of lime particles significantly affects system performance (even lime graded to exceed 0.25 inch contained enough fine-grained material to induce bridging.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Water characteristics post-lime treatment and retention (outflow of sedimentation pond)
Other performance details:When the Aquafix system was operating properly the pH exceeded 10 and removal percentages for metals of concern generally exceeded 90%.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Values represent the time when the system was operational

°Cdegrees Celsius
°Fdegrees Fahrenheit
µg/Lmicrograms per liter
µmhos/cmmicromhos per centimeter
µS/cmmicroSiemens per centimeter
AgSilver
AlAluminum
AsArsenic
AWQCAmbient Water Quality Criteria
BBoron
BaBarium
BCRBiochemical Reactor
BeBeryllium
BODBiochemical Oxygen Demand
CaCO3Calcium carbonate
CERCLAComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
cfscubic feet per second
CHITChitorem®
ClChloride
CoCobalt
CO3Carbon trioxide
COCConstituent of Concern
CODChemical Oxygen Demand
CrChromium
CuCopper
DOCDissolved Organic Carbon
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
FFluoride
FBRFluidized Bed Reactor
FeIron
ftfeet
gpmgallons per minute
GWGroundwater
HCO3Bicarbonate
HgMercury
KPotassium
lbspounds
MgMagnesium
MGMillion Gallons
Mg(OH)2Magnesium hydroxide
mg/Lmilligrams per liter
MnManganese
MoMolybdenum
mVmillivolts
NNitrogen
N/Anot applicable
NaSodium
NANot available
NDNot detected
NiNickel
NO3Nitrate
NO3 + NO2Nitrate + Nitrite
NRNot reported
NTUNephelometric Turbidity Unit
OHHydroxide
OUOperable Unit
PPhosphorus
PbLead
PRBPermeable Reactive Barrier
RARemedial Action
ROReverse osmosis
SAPSSuccessive Alkalinity Producing System
SbAntimony
SeSelenium
SO42-Sulfate
SRBSulfate Reducing Bacteria
STCSeep Treatment Cell
TDSTotal Dissolved Solids
TOCTotal Organic Carbon
TSSTotal Suspended Solids
UUranium
UFUltra-filtration
VVanadium
VFRVertical Flow Reactor
ZnZinc

LabelDescription
Site NameName of the site
EPA CERCLA IDEPA CERCLA ID number
Parent NameIf the test was conducted at a 'child' site or an alias, this is the name of the larger associated Superfund site.
Operable Unit (OU)Specific operable unit (OU) of the site if specified
Technology TestedName of the technology tested
Technology TypeThe technology type (i.e., active or passive/semi-passive)
Source of MIWSource of the MIW (e.g., adit drainage, groundwater)
Treatment Train? (Y/N)Whether the treatment was a treatment train (i.e., multiple individual technologies)
Specific Component for Performance DataComponent for which data are reported
Technology RequirementsRequirements of the technology (e.g., electricity, pH > or < X, dissolved oxygen < X, etc.)
Geographic conditions/ constraintsGeographic conditions/constraints (e.g., topography, climate)
Scale Scale of the technology (e.g., pilot, or full-scale application)
Duration of StudyLength of the study
ConstituentElement or ion treated
Constituent PhaseIdentity - contaminants of concern (COCs) and others having data/information on treatment
UnitUnit of concentration reported in study
Max. Influent ConcentrationMaximum influent concentration treated
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Max. Effluent ConcentrationMaximum effluent concentration treated
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Influent ConcentrationMinimum influent concentration treated and
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Effluent ConcentrationMinimum effluent concentration treated and
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Avg. Influent ConcentrationAverage influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Influent ConcentrationMedian influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Effluent ConcentrationAverage effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Effluent ConcentrationMedian effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Percent RemovalAverage percent removal
ParametersParameters associated with the concentrations of other data documented
Loads TreatedMass of constituent per unit flow
pHpH associated with documented concentrations
DODO associated with documented concentrations
Water TemperatureWater temperature associated with documented concentrations
Air TemperatureAir temperature associated with documented concentrations
ORPOxidation-reduction potential associated with documented concentrations
Specific ConductivitySpecific conductivity associated with documented concentrations
Flows treatedFlows treated
Were treatment goals met? (Y/N)Whether the testing met the treatment goals
Performance MetricsGoals or performance metrics upon which the treatment success was based
Limitations/ConstraintsAny limitations or constraints noted that contributed to success or failure
Longevity EstimatesEstimates of longevity, if provided
Lessons LearnedAny reported lessons learned
Reported Cost DataAny reported cost data
Other design detailsAny other design details provided in the sources cited
Other performance detailsAny other performance details provided in the sources cited
Limitations to the found dataLimitations to the data found (e.g., data in the source only presented as averages, so was unable to report maximum influent treated with corresponding effluent attained)
NotesAny notes