Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

information

We are making some changes to CLU-IN. If you have any feedback or questions, please contact us.

Share |
Connect | Archived Internet Seminars and Podcasts News Feeds (RSS) TechDirect and Newsletters

Characterization, Cleanup, and Revitalization of Mining Sites

Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water Profile

Technology: Pond neutralization

Report
White King Pond Neutralization Report, White King/Lucky Lass Mines Site Lakeview, Oregon
Source or source contact: Rebecca C. Feldman, Remedial Project Manager, Feldman.Rebecca.C@epa.gov,
Publication Date: 1/28/1999
Document Type: PDF
Author: Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Prepared for: Kerr-McGee Corporation

Site Identifiers

Site Name: FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST/WHITE KING AND LUCKY LASS URANIUM MINES (USDA)
EPA CERCLA ID: OR7122307658
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: Site 4
Site Status: Post operations
Technology Tested: Application of hydrated lime - pond neutralization
Technology Type: Active
Technology Name: Pond neutralization
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: No pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Open pit uranium mine filled with water (now a pond)
Treatment Train? (Y/N): N
Specific Component for Performance Data: No pre- or post-treatment
Technology Requirements: Slurry was delivered to the pond by means of a revolving spray nozzle mounted on a float. Hydrated lime slurry was pumped from a tanker truck to the spray nozzle and conveyed through 500 feet of floating 3-inch-diameter hose.
Geographic conditions/constraints: White King pond contains approximately 79 million gallons of water and covers 13.4 acres. Maximum water depth is approximately 70 ft; Average water depth is approximately 18 ft.
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: Pre-lime application (August 18, 1998) post-lime application (August 19, 1998)

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.00012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ag, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ag. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0057 mg/L)

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.00012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ag, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ag. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0057 mg/L)

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.072
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.015
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):79.17

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.036 mg/L EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total As, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved As. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0232
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0222
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):4.31

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ba, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ba. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, Dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0229
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0198
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):13.54

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ba, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ba. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, Total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0232
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0226
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):2.59

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ba, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ba. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, Dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0226
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0206
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):8.85

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ba, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ba. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.00012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ag, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ag. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0057 mg/L)

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.00012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ag, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ag. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0057 mg/L)

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2.1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: ND = non-detect (0.46 mg/L). Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes:

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.4
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: ND = non-detect (0.46 mg/L). Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes:

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0011 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cd, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cd. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.72
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.91
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-4.03

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total K, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved K. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.55
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.73
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):52.90

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N for this sample, report says Al meets PRG overall
Performance Metrics:0.2 mg/L; EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Al, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Al. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.50
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.09
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.2 mg/L; EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Al, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Al. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.60
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.78
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):51.25

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N for this sample, report says Al meets PRG overall
Performance Metrics:0.2 mg/L; EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Al, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Al. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.52
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.066
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.66

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.2 mg/L; EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Al, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Al. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.046
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.027
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):41.30

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.036 mg/L EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total As, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved As. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.032
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.012
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):62.50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.036 mg/L EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total As, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved As. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.097
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.046
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):52.58

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N for this sample, report says As meets PRG overall
Performance Metrics:0.036 mg/L EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total As, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved As. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0037
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.002
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):45.95

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.0053 mg/L; lowest observed effects level
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Be, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Be. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0037
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):77.03

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.0053 mg/L; lowest observed effects level
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Be, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Be. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0038
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0023
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):39.47

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.0053 mg/L; lowest observed effects level
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Be, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Be. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0037
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):77.03

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.0053 mg/L; lowest observed effects level
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Be, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Be. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2.1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: ND = non-detect. Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes:

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.4
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: ND = non-detect. Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes:

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29.7
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:36.6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-23.23

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ca, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ca. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:35.4
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-22.07

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ca, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ca. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 30.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:36.9
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-19.81

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ca, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ca. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:35.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-22.41

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ca, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ca. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0011 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cd, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cd. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0011 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cd, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cd. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0011 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cd, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cd. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0017 mg/L)

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0311
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0252
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):18.97

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Co, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Co. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0341
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0253
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):25.81

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Co, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Co. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0318
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0262
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):17.61

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Co, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Co. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #41

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.0334
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0263
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):21.26

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Co, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Co. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #42

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.011 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cr, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cr. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0054 mg/L)

Data Set #43

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.011 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cr, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cr. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0054 mg/L)

Data Set #44

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.011 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cr, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cr. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0054 mg/L)

Data Set #45

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.011 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cr, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cr. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0054 mg/L)

Data Set #46

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.012 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cu, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cu. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0058 mg/L)

Data Set #47

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.012 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cu, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cu. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0058 mg/L)

Data Set #48

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.012 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cu, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cu. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0058 mg/L)

Data Set #49

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.012 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Cu, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Cu. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0058 mg/L)

Data Set #50

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.32
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):37.50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:1 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Fe, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Fe. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #51

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.3
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):73.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:1 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Fe, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Fe. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.16 mg/L)

Data Set #52

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.46
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.25
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):45.65

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:1 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Fe, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Fe. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #53

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.38
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):78.95

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:1 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Fe, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Fe. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.16 mg/L)

Data Set #54

Constituent Information

Constituent: Mercury
Constituent Phase:Hg, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.000053
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.000069
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-30.19

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.000012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Hg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Hg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #55

Constituent Information

Constituent: Mercury
Constituent Phase:Hg, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.000049
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.000042
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):14.29

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.000012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Hg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Hg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #56

Constituent Information

Constituent: Mercury
Constituent Phase:Hg, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.000109
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.000042
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):61.47

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.000012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Hg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Hg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #57

Constituent Information

Constituent: Mercury
Constituent Phase:Hg, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.000092
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.000063
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):31.52

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.000012 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Hg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Hg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #58

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.69
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.88
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-4.05

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total K, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved K. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #59

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.64
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.67
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.65

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total K, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved K. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #60

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.61
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1.95

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total K, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved K. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #61

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7.86
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7.87
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.13

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #62

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7.69
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1.43

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #63

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7.94
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7.99
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.63

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #64

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7.72
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.26

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mg, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mg. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #65

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.685
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.607
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):11.39

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #66

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.677
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.571
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):15.66

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #67

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.695
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.628
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):9.64

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #68

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.681
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.596
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):12.48

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Mn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Mn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #69

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 11.7
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:12.1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-3.42

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Na, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Na. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #70

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 11.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:11.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1.74

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Na, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Na. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #71

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 11.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:12.2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-3.39

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Na, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Na. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #72

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 11.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:11.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-2.61

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Na, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Na. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #73

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.063
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.051
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):19.05

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.16 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ni, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ni. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #74

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total sulfate, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved sulfate. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #75

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 285
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:296
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-3.86

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #76

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #77

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 299
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:337
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-12.71

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #78

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #79

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.04 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Tl, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Tl. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0097 mg/L)

Data Set #80

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.062
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0444
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):28.39

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.16 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ni, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ni. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #81

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.064
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.053
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):17.19

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.16 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ni, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ni. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #82

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.061
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.0455
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):25.41

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.16 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Ni, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Ni. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #83

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0032 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Pb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Pb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0065 mg/L)

Data Set #84

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0032 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Pb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Pb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0065 mg/L)

Data Set #85

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0032 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Pb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Pb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0065 mg/L)

Data Set #86

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.0032 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Pb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Pb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0065 mg/L)

Data Set #87

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8.34
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-85.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N, individual sample meets goal, but longer term average (after fully mixing) does not
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #88

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N, individual sample meets goal, but longer term average (after fully mixing) does not
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes:

Data Set #89

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.35
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7.11
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-63.45

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N, individual sample meets goal, but longer term average (after fully mixing) does not
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #90

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N, individual sample meets goal, but longer term average (after fully mixing) does not
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:The pH value immediately after application showed it met criteria, but after subsequent mixing, pH was overall too low.

Notes: Unclear why pH values from Table B-2 and Table 2-1 do not match for post-treatment at 50 ft

Data Set #91

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 60

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.19
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6.1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-45.58

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (Sept 13, 1998)
pH:4.19
DO:4.29 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.93 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:466 mV
Specific Conductivity:528 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #92

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 60

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (Nov 19, 1998)
pH:6.1
DO:10.51 mg/L
Water Temperature:3.96 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:355 mV
Specific Conductivity:340 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #93

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 66.7

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 4.21
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.84
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-38.72

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (Sept 13, 1998)
pH:4.21
DO:0.20 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.79 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:423 mV
Specific Conductivity:798 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #94

Constituent Information

Constituent: pH
Constituent Phase:pH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 67.3

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (Nov 19, 1998)
pH:5.84
DO:10.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:3.96 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:302 mV
Specific Conductivity:339 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:6.5 - 9 EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #95

Constituent Information

Constituent: Antimony
Constituent Phase:Sb, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:1.6 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Sb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Sb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.25 mg/L)

Data Set #96

Constituent Information

Constituent: Antimony
Constituent Phase:Sb, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:1.6 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Sb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Sb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.25 mg/L)

Data Set #97

Constituent Information

Constituent: Antimony
Constituent Phase:Sb, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:1.6 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Sb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Sb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.25 mg/L)

Data Set #98

Constituent Information

Constituent: Antimony
Constituent Phase:Sb, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:1.6 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Sb, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Sb. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.25 mg/L)

Data Set #99

Constituent Information

Constituent: Selenium
Constituent Phase:Se, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.035 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Se, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Se. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0059 mg/L)

Data Set #100

Constituent Information

Constituent: Selenium
Constituent Phase:Se, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.035 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Se, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Se. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0059 mg/L)

Data Set #101

Constituent Information

Constituent: Selenium
Constituent Phase:Se, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.035 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Se, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Se. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0059 mg/L)

Data Set #102

Constituent Information

Constituent: Selenium
Constituent Phase:Se, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.035 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Se, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Se. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0059 mg/L)

Data Set #103

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 143
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:148
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-3.50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total sulfate, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved sulfate. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #104

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total sulfate, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved sulfate. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #105

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 147
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:142
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):3.40

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total sulfate, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved sulfate. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #106

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.04 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Tl, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Tl. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0097 mg/L)

Data Set #107

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.04 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Tl, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Tl. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0097 mg/L)

Data Set #108

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N/A
Performance Metrics:0.04 (hardness dependent criterion - used 100 mg/L); AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Tl, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Tl. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0097 mg/L)

Data Set #109

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.4
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: ND = non-detect. Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #110

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #111

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: ND = non-detect. Post-lime water chemistry data are presented on the row below.

Data Set #112

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Suspended Solids
Constituent Phase:TSS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:

Data Set #113

Constituent Information

Constituent: Vanadium
Constituent Phase:V, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total V, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved V. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0028 mg/L)

Data Set #114

Constituent Information

Constituent: Vanadium
Constituent Phase:V, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total V, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved V. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0028 mg/L)

Data Set #115

Constituent Information

Constituent: Vanadium
Constituent Phase:V, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total V, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved V. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0028 mg/L)

Data Set #116

Constituent Information

Constituent: Vanadium
Constituent Phase:V, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: ND
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:ND
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total V, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved V. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations. ND = non-detect (0.0028 mg/L)

Data Set #117

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.098
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.069
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):29.59

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.5
DO:7.06 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.91 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:513 mV
Specific Conductivity:397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.11 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Zn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Zn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #118

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 30

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.101
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.035
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):65.35

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:8.34
DO:7.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.73 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:379 mV
Specific Conductivity:412 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.11 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Zn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Zn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #119

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.132
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.088
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):33.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Pre-lime (August 18, 1998)
pH:4.35
DO:6.94 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.41 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:518 mV
Specific Conductivity:419 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.11 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Zn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Zn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

Data Set #120

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: 50

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.106
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.062
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):41.51

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Post-lime (August 19, 1998)
pH:7.09
DO:7.00 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:326 mV
Specific Conductivity:415 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:0.11 AWQC Freshwater Chronic (OAR 340-41 water quality criteria)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Data not provided
Other performance details:Additional lime application was needed to treat deepest part of the lake, which was not well mixed with rest of lake
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Pre-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for total Zn, while post-treatment water chemistry data are presented on the row for dissolved Zn. The pre and post-treatment water chemistry data apply to both total and dissolved concentrations.

°Cdegrees Celsius
°Fdegrees Fahrenheit
µg/Lmicrograms per liter
µmhos/cmmicromhos per centimeter
µS/cmmicroSiemens per centimeter
AgSilver
AlAluminum
AsArsenic
AWQCAmbient Water Quality Criteria
BBoron
BaBarium
BCRBiochemical Reactor
BeBeryllium
BODBiochemical Oxygen Demand
CaCO3Calcium carbonate
CERCLAComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
cfscubic feet per second
CHITChitorem®
ClChloride
CoCobalt
CO3Carbon trioxide
COCConstituent of Concern
CODChemical Oxygen Demand
CrChromium
CuCopper
DOCDissolved Organic Carbon
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
FFluoride
FBRFluidized Bed Reactor
FeIron
ftfeet
gpmgallons per minute
GWGroundwater
HCO3Bicarbonate
HgMercury
KPotassium
lbspounds
MgMagnesium
MGMillion Gallons
Mg(OH)2Magnesium hydroxide
mg/Lmilligrams per liter
MnManganese
MoMolybdenum
mVmillivolts
NNitrogen
N/Anot applicable
NaSodium
NANot available
NDNot detected
NiNickel
NO3Nitrate
NO3 + NO2Nitrate + Nitrite
NRNot reported
NTUNephelometric Turbidity Unit
OHHydroxide
OUOperable Unit
PPhosphorus
PbLead
PRBPermeable Reactive Barrier
RARemedial Action
ROReverse osmosis
SAPSSuccessive Alkalinity Producing System
SbAntimony
SeSelenium
SO42-Sulfate
SRBSulfate Reducing Bacteria
STCSeep Treatment Cell
TDSTotal Dissolved Solids
TOCTotal Organic Carbon
TSSTotal Suspended Solids
UUranium
UFUltra-filtration
VVanadium
VFRVertical Flow Reactor
ZnZinc

LabelDescription
Site NameName of the site
EPA CERCLA IDEPA CERCLA ID number
Parent NameIf the test was conducted at a 'child' site or an alias, this is the name of the larger associated Superfund site.
Operable Unit (OU)Specific operable unit (OU) of the site if specified
Technology TestedName of the technology tested
Technology TypeThe technology type (i.e., active or passive/semi-passive)
Source of MIWSource of the MIW (e.g., adit drainage, groundwater)
Treatment Train? (Y/N)Whether the treatment was a treatment train (i.e., multiple individual technologies)
Specific Component for Performance DataComponent for which data are reported
Technology RequirementsRequirements of the technology (e.g., electricity, pH > or < X, dissolved oxygen < X, etc.)
Geographic conditions/ constraintsGeographic conditions/constraints (e.g., topography, climate)
Scale Scale of the technology (e.g., pilot, or full-scale application)
Duration of StudyLength of the study
ConstituentElement or ion treated
Constituent PhaseIdentity - contaminants of concern (COCs) and others having data/information on treatment
UnitUnit of concentration reported in study
Max. Influent ConcentrationMaximum influent concentration treated
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Max. Effluent ConcentrationMaximum effluent concentration treated
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Influent ConcentrationMinimum influent concentration treated and
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Effluent ConcentrationMinimum effluent concentration treated and
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Avg. Influent ConcentrationAverage influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Influent ConcentrationMedian influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Effluent ConcentrationAverage effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Effluent ConcentrationMedian effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Percent RemovalAverage percent removal
ParametersParameters associated with the concentrations of other data documented
Loads TreatedMass of constituent per unit flow
pHpH associated with documented concentrations
DODO associated with documented concentrations
Water TemperatureWater temperature associated with documented concentrations
Air TemperatureAir temperature associated with documented concentrations
ORPOxidation-reduction potential associated with documented concentrations
Specific ConductivitySpecific conductivity associated with documented concentrations
Flows treatedFlows treated
Were treatment goals met? (Y/N)Whether the testing met the treatment goals
Performance MetricsGoals or performance metrics upon which the treatment success was based
Limitations/ConstraintsAny limitations or constraints noted that contributed to success or failure
Longevity EstimatesEstimates of longevity, if provided
Lessons LearnedAny reported lessons learned
Reported Cost DataAny reported cost data
Other design detailsAny other design details provided in the sources cited
Other performance detailsAny other performance details provided in the sources cited
Limitations to the found dataLimitations to the data found (e.g., data in the source only presented as averages, so was unable to report maximum influent treated with corresponding effluent attained)
NotesAny notes