Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

information

We are making some changes to CLU-IN. If you have any feedback or questions, please contact us.

Share |
Connect | Archived Internet Seminars and Podcasts News Feeds (RSS) TechDirect and Newsletters

Characterization, Cleanup, and Revitalization of Mining Sites

Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water Profile

Technology: Biochemical reactor (BCR)

Report
Final Danny T Adit Treatability Study Year 1 Technical Memorandum, Barker-Hughesville Mining District Superfund Site Cascade and Judith Basin Counties, Montana
Source or source contact: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/1817984.pdf
Publication Date: 3/5/2014
Document Type: PDF
Author: CDM Smith (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 8

Site Identifiers

Site Name: BARKER HUGHESVILLE MINING DISTRICT
EPA CERCLA ID: MT6122307485
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: BCR1
Site Status: Data not provided
Technology Tested: Biochemical reactor (BCR) without pre-treatment (BCR1)
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Biochemical reactor (BCR)
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: No pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Danny T adit water
Treatment Train? (Y/N): N
Specific Component for Performance Data: BCR without pre-treatment
Technology Requirements: Batteries used to run metering pump, slurry mixer, and timer switch
Geographic conditions/constraints: Remote central Montana, southeast of Great Falls/no constraints noted
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: June - September 2013

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:270
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):67.07

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 460
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:130
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):71.74

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 450
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)35.71

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4 U 4 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 660
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.70

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 15,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:130
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.17

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved Al for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,010
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.98

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for total Al for BCR 1
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 840
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration10,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)92.29

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.54
DO:3.17 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.66 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:114.1 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,058 µS/cm
Other Parameters:33.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved Al for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:870 870
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.10

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for total Al for BCR 1
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 18,900
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,070
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.34

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for total Al for BCR 1
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8,710
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:290
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):96.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved Al for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,070
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration18,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)94.34

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for total Al for BCR 1
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70–1,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:90 90
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 14,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.40

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.14
DO:0.57 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.07 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-76.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,388 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved Al for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70–1,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 94
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration324
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)70.99

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,400
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70 70
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 324
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:94
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):70.99

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 311
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:15
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.18

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved As for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:10
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.33

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.55

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved As for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 15
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration311
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)95.18

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved As for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:10 10
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.33

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6 6
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.55

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 92%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:This is the consistent removal rate for dissolved As for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 83%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Be reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50–640
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Influent is a range to reflect multiple days with the same observations (U).

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50 U–550
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Influent is a range to reflect multiple days with the same observations (U).

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50–640
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Influent is a range to reflect multiple days with the same observations (U).

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50 U–550
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Influent is a range to reflect multiple days with the same observations (U).

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 640
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 550
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50 50
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #41

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50 U 50 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #42

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #43

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):80.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes:  

Data Set #44

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U–1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):83.3 - 91.7

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 83%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Be reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #45

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)80.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes:  

Data Set #46

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)83.33

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 83%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–5.67
DO:1.5–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)46.6–57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Be reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #47

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.75

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #48

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 91.7 - 93.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 83%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Be reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent observations.

Data Set #49

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:85–1,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #50

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:85–1,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #51

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,700
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #52

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:85 85
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #53

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #54

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #55

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #56

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #57

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 107
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:437
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-308.41

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #58

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 108
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:428
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-296.30

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #59

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:228
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-132.65

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #60

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:223–233
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)150.5 - (-)139.8

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Range of values reflects more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #61

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 437
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration107
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-308.41

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #62

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 428
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration108
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-296.30

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #63

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:228 228
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -132.65

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #64

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:223 223
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -139.78

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #65

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 293
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):92.83

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #66

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #67

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #68

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #69

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #70

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 316
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.84

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #71

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.33

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #72

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.68

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #73

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 21
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration293
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)92.83

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #74

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration155
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.35

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #75

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.33

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #76

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–72.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #77

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 55
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration55
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)0.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR. Co is not likely removed via a chemical reaction to precipitate Co as a carbonate, oxy-hydroxide, or sulfide.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #78

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:14 14
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 56
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 75.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #79

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #80

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent value.

Data Set #81

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1–100
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)4900 - 50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #82

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U–2 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #83

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 100
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-4900.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #84

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–5.7
DO:1.09–1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:35.3–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:12–13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #85

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 56
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:14
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):75.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #86

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 58
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.69

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR. Co is not likely removed via a chemical reaction to precipitate Co as a carbonate, oxy-hydroxide, or sulfide.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #87

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #88

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:42
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-16.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR. Co is not likely removed via a chemical reaction to precipitate Co as a carbonate, oxy-hydroxide, or sulfide.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #89

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)0.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #90

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 58
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 95.69

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR. Co is not likely removed via a chemical reaction to precipitate Co as a carbonate, oxy-hydroxide, or sulfide.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #91

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,160
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.72

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #92

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.79

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #93

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.73

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #94

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 191
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,040
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.64

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #95

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,160
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.72

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #96

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.79

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #97

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #98

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #99

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #100

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #101

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #102

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #103

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,040
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:191
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.64

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #104

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924–1,940
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.9

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.57–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)76.8–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #105

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 180,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5,100
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.17

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #106

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 179,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8,490
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.26

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #107

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:83,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):35.35

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #108

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 112,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:74,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):33.30

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #109

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 84,400
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)34.57

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #110

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 138,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration162,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)14.81

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #111

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8,490 8,490
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 179,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 95.26

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #112

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5,100 5,100
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 180,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 97.17

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #113

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.3–1.4
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)75 - (-)62.5

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #114

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-550.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #115

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 2
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-185.71

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #116

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.3 0.3
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 40.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #117

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #118

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #119

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #120

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #121

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):50.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #122

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1–166
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)16500 - 0

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.95
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #123

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:169
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #124

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #125

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 169
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #126

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 166
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-16500.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #127

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 50.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #128

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67–5.91
DO:1.5–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)46.6–57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #129

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 128,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:122,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):4.69

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCE. Removal of Mn is not expected in a BCR since Mn does not form a stable sulfide precipitate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #130

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 24
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:163
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-579.17

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #131

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 25
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:40
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-60.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #132

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 22
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):4.55

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #133

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-10.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #134

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 163
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-579.17

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #135

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 162
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-575.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #136

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21 21
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 4.55

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #137

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22 22
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -10.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67–5.7
DO:1.33–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424–3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more that one day with the same effluent.

Data Set #138

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):83.02

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #139

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 101,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:102,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.99

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #140

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98,400
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:98,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.20

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCE. Removal of Mn is not expected in a BCR since Mn does not form a stable sulfide precipitate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #141

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 102,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration101,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-0.99

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #142

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 122,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration116,000–128,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)(-)5.2 - 4.7

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7–6.14
DO:0.57–1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.07 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)76.8–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,388–2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCE. Removal of Mn is not expected in a BCR since Mn does not form a stable sulfide precipitate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same effluent.

Data Set #143

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21,900 21,900
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 83.02

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #144

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:21,700 21,700
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 124,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 82.50

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCE. Removal of Mn is not expected in a BCR since Mn does not form a stable sulfide precipitate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #145

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #146

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #147

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #148

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #149

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.0–22.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)340 - 0

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #150

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.0–7.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0 - 28.6

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.41–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–482.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #151

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.0–22.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): (-)340 - 0

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #152

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #153

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 22
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-340.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #154

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 23
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-283.33

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #155

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 0.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #156

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5.0–7.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 0 - 28.6

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67–6.14
DO:0.57–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.07 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)76.8–57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #157

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):38.46

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #158

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):43.59

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Generally Ni removal was poor in BCR1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #159

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #160

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 28
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-3.57

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Generally Ni removal was poor in BCR1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #161

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)0.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #162

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 36
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration34
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-5.88

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Generally Ni removal was poor in BCR1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #163

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24 24
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 38.46

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #164

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8 8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 37
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 78.38

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.14
DO:0.57 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.07 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-76.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,388 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Generally Ni removal was poor in BCR1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #165

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.478
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.083
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):82.64

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.94
DO:
Water Temperature:16.34 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #166

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:43.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #167

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 43.8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #168

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.027 0.027
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.218
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 87.61

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6
DO:1.09 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:35.3 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992 µS/cm
Other Parameters:12 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #169

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122–252
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.6 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 96%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #170

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:9
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):96.51

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #171

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 252
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.80

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 96%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #172

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 255
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:60
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):76.47

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #173

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.59

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 96%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #174

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 60
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration255
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)76.47

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #175

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration122–252
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.6 - 99.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 96%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #176

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6 6
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 97.67

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #177

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #178

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #179

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 4
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #180

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.04 U 0.04 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–5.7
DO:1.09–1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:35.3–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:12–13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #181

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,100
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):56.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #182

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:240
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):85.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #183

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,400
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)36.36

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.7
DO:1.33 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:13.6 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #184

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:240 240
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 85.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #185

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,860
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,870
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.54

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #186

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-15.38

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #187

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 3,730
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1,840
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-102.72

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #188

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,500 1,500
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -15.38

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #189

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):86.11

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 72 %
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.8
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.47–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:482.2–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Tl reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #190

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #191

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.3
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):89.13

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 72 %
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Tl reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #192

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #193

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #194

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)86.1 - 89.1

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 72 %
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Tl reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #195

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 90.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.07
DO:0.02–1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–(-)46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #196

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 86.1 - 89.1

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 72 %
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.6–6.14
DO:0.02–2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.95–20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)163–77.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,992–3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Tl reductions for BCR 1. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #197

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 71,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3,690
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.80

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #198

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 69,100
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.93

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #199

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 45,700
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:34,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):24.95

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #200

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 44,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:39,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):11.46

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #201

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 34,300
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration45,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)24.95

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1.5 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.95 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-46.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,190 µS/cm
Other Parameters:15.9 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #202

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 39,400
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration44,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)11.46

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.67
DO:2.31 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.52 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:57.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,034 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #203

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3,690 3,690
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 71,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 94.80

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #204

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:50 50
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 69,100
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.93

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.07
DO:0.02 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.6 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-163 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,505 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Results support the need for pretreatment of high acidity MIW ahead of the BCR.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Report
Final Danny T Adit Treatability Study Year 1 Technical Memorandum, Barker-Hughesville Mining District Superfund Site Cascade and Judith Basin Counties, Montana
Source or source contact: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/1817984.pdf
Publication Date: 3/5/2014
Document Type: PDF
Author: CDM Smith (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 8

Site Identifiers

Site Name: BARKER HUGHESVILLE MINING DISTRICT
EPA CERCLA ID: MT6122307485
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: BCR2
Site Status: Data not provided
Technology Tested: Biochemical reactor (BCR) with SAPS pre-treatment (BCR2)
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Biochemical reactor (BCR)
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: Pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Danny T adit water
Treatment Train? (Y/N): Y
Specific Component for Performance Data: BCR with pre-treatment
Technology Requirements: Batteries used to run metering pump, slurry mixer, and timer switch
Geographic conditions/constraints: Remote central Montana, southeast of Great Falls/no constraints noted
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: June - September 2013

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.76–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.76–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:16
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.05

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 460
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:80
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):82.61

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 270
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)61.43

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4 U 4 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 660
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.70

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 18,900
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,050
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.44

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 15,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:140
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.10

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent percent removal for dissolved Al. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:120
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.05

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8,710
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:60
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.31

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent percent removal for dissolved Al. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,050
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration18,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)94.44

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 140
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration15,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.10

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent percent removal for dissolved Al. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:120 120
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.05

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:30 U 30 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 14,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.90

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 90%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent percent removal for dissolved Al. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70–570
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:100–1,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:100–1,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,700
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:100 100
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 324
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:64
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):80.25

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 311
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:20
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.57

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Human Health Standard
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.85

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Human Health Standard
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 64
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration324
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)80.25

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 20
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration311
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)93.57

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Human Health Standard
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3 3
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 98.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2 2
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 97.85

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.56–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)67.7–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Human Health Standard
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: pH etc. is a range to reflect multiple dates with the same effluent observation.

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:80–710
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:80–710
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70–570
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 710
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 570
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:80 80
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:70 70
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #41

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 90.0 - 93.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #42

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 91.7 - 93.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #43

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #44

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #45

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #46

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #47

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.0 - 93.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #48

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)91.7 -93.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #49

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:120–2,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #50

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:120–2,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #51

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 2,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #52

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:120 120
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #53

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 461
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration107
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-330.84

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #54

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 453
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration108
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-319.44

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #55

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #56

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #57

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 94
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #58

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:35 U 35 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #59

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:271 271
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -176.53

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #60

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:275 275
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -195.70

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #61

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 107
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:461
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-330.84

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #62

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 108
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:453
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-319.44

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #63

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:271
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-176.53

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #64

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:275–280
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)201.1 - (-)195.7

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Range of values reflects more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #65

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #66

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #67

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #68

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #69

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 293
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:9
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):96.93

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #70

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 316
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.84

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #71

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #72

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.68

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #73

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 9
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration293
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)96.93

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #74

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration154–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.7 - 99.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent observations below the detection limit.

Data Set #75

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.67

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.45 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:0.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #76

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cd reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent observations below the detection limit.

Data Set #77

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1–210
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)10400 - 50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #78

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U–2 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #79

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 210
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-10400.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #80

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.02
DO:1–1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–20.45 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:0.6–18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #81

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 56
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:16
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):71.43

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #82

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 58
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:11
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):81.03

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #83

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:37
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):5.13

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #84

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:35
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):2.78

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #85

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 37
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)5.13

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #86

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 35
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration36–38
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)2.8 - 7.9

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.26
DO:1.67–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)28–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #87

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:16 16
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 56
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 71.43

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #88

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7 7
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 48
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 85.42

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #89

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):16.67

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #90

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent observation.

Data Set #91

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #92

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent value.

Data Set #93

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)16.67

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #94

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #95

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #96

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #97

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,040
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:186
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.88

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #98

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,160
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.77

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #99

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.79

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #100

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.73

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #101

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 186
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,040
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.88

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #102

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,160
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.77

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #103

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.79

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #104

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924–1,940
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.9

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.56–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)67.7–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Cu reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #105

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 179,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6,540
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):96.35

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #106

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 180,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5,080
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.18

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Decline in Fe removal is likely due to the lack of sulfate reduction in the substrate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #107

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:45,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):65.12

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #108

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 112,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:33,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):69.91

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Decline in Fe removal is likely due to the lack of sulfate reduction in the substrate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #109

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 45,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)65.12

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #110

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 77,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration162,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)52.47

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Decline in Fe removal is likely due to the lack of sulfate reduction in the substrate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #111

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6,540 6,540
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 179,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 96.35

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #112

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5,080 5,080
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 180,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 97.18

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Decline in Fe removal is likely due to the lack of sulfate reduction in the substrate.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #113

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1.4–1.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)87.5 - (-)75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #114

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-300.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #115

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1.9
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-171.43

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #116

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.2 0.2
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 60.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #117

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:424
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #118

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U–1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #119

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 424
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #120

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #121

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #122

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #123

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #124

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):50.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #125

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1–421
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)42000 - 0

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.95
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #126

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 421
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-42000.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #127

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 50.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #128

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #129

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 24
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:243
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-912.50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #130

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 25
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:48
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-92.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #131

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 22
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #132

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-10.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #133

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 243
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-912.50

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #134

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 246
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-925.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #135

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22 22
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 21
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -4.76

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #136

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22 22
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20–22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): (-)10 - 0

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02–6.26
DO:1.62–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)28–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same effluent.

Data Set #137

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7,590
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.12

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #138

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 128,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:102,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):20.31

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #139

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 101,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:102,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-0.99

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #140

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98,400
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:99,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1.52

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #141

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 102,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration101,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-0.99

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:1.67
DO: mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #142

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 127,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration116,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-9.48

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #143

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7,590 7,590
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 94.12

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #144

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:99,000 99,000
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -0.61

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #145

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #146

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #147

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 3.2
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #148

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.05 U 0.05 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #149

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 0.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #150

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 0.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #151

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 35
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-600.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #152

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 37
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-516.67

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #153

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.0–35.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)600 - 0

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #154

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.41–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–482.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #155

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5.0–35.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): (-)600 - 0

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #156

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #157

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 37
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.24

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #158

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):0.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #159

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:35
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):10.26

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #160

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:27
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):6.90

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #161

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 28
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):14.29

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #162

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)0.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #163

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 35
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)10.26

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #164

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:27 27
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 6.90

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #165

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.61

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #166

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.478
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.355
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):25.73

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.94
DO:
Water Temperature:16.34 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #167

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:57.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #168

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 57.8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #169

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.61

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #170

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.02 0.02
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.13
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 84.62

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #171

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 252
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.80

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #172

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 255
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:72
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):71.76

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #173

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.59

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #174

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 72
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration255
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)71.76

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #175

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration122–212
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.6 - 99.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #176

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122–212
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.6 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Consistent dissolved Pb reductions for BCR 2. The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #177

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.04 U 0.04 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91
DO:1 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.45 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:0.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019 µS/cm
Other Parameters:1.14 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #178

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #179

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):60.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #180

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:480
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):70.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #181

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,300
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)40.91

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.02
DO:1.62 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:18.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,397 µS/cm
Other Parameters:16.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #182

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:480 480
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 70.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #183

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #184

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 11
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #185

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,460 1,460
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -12.31

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #186

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,860
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,890
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1.61

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #187

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,460
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-12.31

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #188

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5,180
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1,840
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-181.52

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #189

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 90.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29–6.16
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #190

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 86.1 - 89.1

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #191

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #192

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.3
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):89.13

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #193

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #194

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):86.11

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.8
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.47–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:482.2–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #195

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29–6.16
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #196

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)86.1 - 89.1

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #197

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 71,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,580
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.77

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #198

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 69,100
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:40
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.94

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #199

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 45,700
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:15,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):66.08

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #200

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 44,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:13,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):69.21

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #201

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 15,500
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration45,700
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)66.08

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16
DO:1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187 µS/cm
Other Parameters:17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #202

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 13,700
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration44,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)69.21

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.26
DO:8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:18.4 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,224 µS/cm
Other Parameters:92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #203

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,580 1,580
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 71,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 97.77

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.29
DO:0.05 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-153.8 mV
Specific Conductivity:4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #204

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:20 20
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 57,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.97

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.32
DO:0.56 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-67.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,552 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Report
Final Danny T Adit Treatability Study Year 1 Technical Memorandum, Barker-Hughesville Mining District Superfund Site Cascade and Judith Basin Counties, Montana
Source or source contact: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/1817984.pdf
Publication Date: 3/5/2014
Document Type: PDF
Author: CDM Smith (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 8

Site Identifiers

Site Name: BARKER HUGHESVILLE MINING DISTRICT
EPA CERCLA ID: MT6122307485
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: BCR3
Site Status: Data not provided
Technology Tested: Biochemical reactor (BCR) with CHIT pre-treatment (BCR3)
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Biochemical reactor (BCR)
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: Pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Danny T adit water
Treatment Train? (Y/N): Y
Specific Component for Performance Data: BCR with pre-treatment
Technology Requirements: Batteries used to run metering pump, slurry mixer, and timer switch
Geographic conditions/constraints: Remote central Montana, southeast of Great Falls/no constraints noted
Scale: Pilot
Duration of Study: June - September 2013

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 460
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.57

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #2

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 4 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration460–820
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.6 - 99.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #3

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4 U 4 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 460–820
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.6 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #4

Constituent Information

Constituent: Acidity
Constituent Phase:Acidity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 820
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.76

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #5

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #6

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #7

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #8

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #9

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84–19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)274.4–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #10

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #11

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84–19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)274.4–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #12

Constituent Information

Constituent: Silver
Constituent Phase:Ag, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #13

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 18,900
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:790
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.82

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #14

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 15,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:170
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.91

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 98%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #15

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:160
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.73

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #16

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8,710
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:30 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.83

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 98%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #17

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 790
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration18,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)95.82

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #18

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 170
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration15,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)98.91

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 98%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #19

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:160 160
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 12,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 98.73

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #20

Constituent Information

Constituent: Aluminum
Constituent Phase:Al, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:30 U 30 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8,710–14,900
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.8 - 99.9

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 98%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.1–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)247.5–(-)325.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:22.5–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Influent is a range for multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #21

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,300–2,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #22

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,300–2,600
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #23

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 2,600
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–1.95 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)303.4–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same effluent.

Data Set #24

Constituent Information

Constituent: Alkalinity
Constituent Phase:Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,300 1,300
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #25

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 324
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:107
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):66.98

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #26

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 311
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:75
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):75.88

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #27

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):80.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #28

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:15
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):83.87

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #29

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 107
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration324
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)66.98

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #30

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 75
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration311
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)75.88

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #31

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:29 29
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 80.67

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:22.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #32

Constituent Information

Constituent: Arsenic
Constituent Phase:As, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:15 15
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 83.87

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): N
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #33

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:130–850
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #34

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:90–790
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #35

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:130–850
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #36

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:90–790
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values presented as a range to reflect multiple days with the same effluent or influent observations.

Data Set #37

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 850
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #38

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 790
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #39

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:130 130
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #40

Constituent Information

Constituent: Barium
Constituent Phase:Ba, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:90 90
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 50 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All influent and effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #41

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,500
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #42

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,400 1,400
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.75
DO:2.38 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-325.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,866 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #43

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #44

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.75

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #45

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #46

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #47

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.0 - 93.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #48

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)91.7 -93.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #49

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)90.0 - 93.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 90.0 - 93.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.16–6.29
DO:0.05–1.67 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.67–20.2 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–(-)28 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,187–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–17.8 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #50

Constituent Information

Constituent: Beryllium
Constituent Phase:Be, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 91.7 - 93.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:5.91–6.32
DO:0.05–8.52 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.75–21.15 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)153.8–19.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,019–4,954 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–92.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent.

Data Set #51

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,600–3,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #52

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,600–3,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #53

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 3,200
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.4–6.81
DO:0.10–1.95 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.21–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)303.4–(-)267.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–22.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same effluent.

Data Set #54

Constituent Information

Constituent: Bicarbonate
Constituent Phase:Bicarbonate mg/L as HCO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,600 1,600
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #55

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 605
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration107
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-465.42

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #56

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #57

Constituent Information

Constituent: BOD
Constituent Phase:Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #58

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 107
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:605
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-465.42

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #59

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 108
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:593
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-449.07

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #60

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:586
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-497.96

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #61

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:435–1,040
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)1018.3 - (-)367.7

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Range of values reflects more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #62

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1,040
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration95
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-994.74

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.4
DO:1.95 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-303.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:22.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #63

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:586 586
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -497.96

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #64

Constituent Information

Constituent: Calcium
Constituent Phase:Ca, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:435 435
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 93
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -367.74

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #65

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #66

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #67

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #68

Constituent Information

Constituent: Carbonate
Constituent Phase:Carbonate mg/L as CO3
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #69

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 293
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):97.61

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #70

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 316
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.84

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #71

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.67

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #72

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.68

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit

Data Set #73

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 7
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration293
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)97.61

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #74

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration154–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.7 - 99.8

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values are shown as a range to reflect multiple days with observations below the detection limit.

Data Set #75

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 150
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.67

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations). All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #76

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cadmium
Constituent Phase:Cd, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 154–316
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. Values are shown as a range to reflect multiple days with observations below the detection limit.

Data Set #77

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:31–450
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)22400 -(-)1450

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267–2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #78

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8.0–61.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #79

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 450
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-22400.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #80

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chloride
Constituent Phase:Cl mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8 8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #81

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 56
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:23
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.93

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #82

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 58
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.62

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #83

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.59

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #84

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):93.06

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #85

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 23
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration56
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)58.93

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes:  

Data Set #86

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 24
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration58
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)58.62

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #87

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.59

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events (due to funding limitations).

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #88

Constituent Information

Constituent: Cobalt
Constituent Phase:Co, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 36–55
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 93.1 - 99.5

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.10–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #89

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #90

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 6
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):58.33

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.93
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A rage of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent observation.

Data Set #91

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit.

Data Set #92

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = Under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same influent value.

Data Set #93

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84–19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)274.4–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #94

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #95

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84–19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)274.4–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #96

Constituent Information

Constituent: Chromium
Constituent Phase:Cr, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5 U–6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #97

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,040
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:169
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.72

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #98

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,160
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.63

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #99

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.79

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #100

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.73

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #101

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 169
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,040
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)91.72

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #102

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,160
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.63

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #103

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,180
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.79

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #104

Constituent Information

Constituent: Copper
Constituent Phase:Cu, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 924–1,940
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.7 - 99.9

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.10–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #105

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 179,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:9,660
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.60

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #106

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 180,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8,710
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):95.16

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #107

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:550
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.57

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #108

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 112,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:520
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.54

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #109

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 9,660
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration179,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)94.60

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #110

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 8,710
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration180,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)95.16

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #111

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:550 550
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.57

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #112

Constituent Information

Constituent: Iron
Constituent Phase:Fe, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:30 U 30 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 162,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.99

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.75
DO:2.38 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-325.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,866 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #113

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.4–0.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):37.5 - 50

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #114

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.2
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):50.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #115

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)37.50

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #116

Constituent Information

Constituent: Fluoride
Constituent Phase:F mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.1 0.1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.2–0.7
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 50.0 - 85.7

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–2.38 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,866–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #117

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:379
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #118

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6.0–8.0
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.85
DO:2.19–2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #119

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 379
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #120

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #121

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:NA–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All influent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with influent below the detection limit.

Data Set #122

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #123

Constituent Information

Constituent: Hydroxide
Constituent Phase:Hydroxide mg/L as OH
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #124

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-700.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #125

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:14–379
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)37800 - (-)1300

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.95
DO:3.87–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #126

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 379
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-37800.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #127

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:8 8
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -700.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #128

Constituent Information

Constituent: Potassium
Constituent Phase:K, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6 6
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #129

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 288
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-1100.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #130

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 288
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-1100.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #131

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 24
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:288
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-1100.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #132

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 25
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:113
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-352.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #133

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 22
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:44
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-100.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #134

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:36–60
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)200 - (-)80

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8–2.94
DO:NA–2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.34–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #135

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:44 44
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -100.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #136

Constituent Information

Constituent: Magnesium
Constituent Phase:Mg, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:36 36
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 20
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -80.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #137

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 101,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:61,200
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):39.41

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #138

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 98,400
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:61,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):37.70

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #139

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #140

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 179
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #141

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6,510
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):94.95

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #142

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 128,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,720
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.66

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #143

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 61,200
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration101,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)39.41

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #144

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 61,300
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration98,400
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)37.70

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #145

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:6,510 6,510
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 129,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 94.95

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #146

Constituent Information

Constituent: Manganese
Constituent Phase:Mn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1,720 1,720
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 128,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 98.66

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.81
DO:0.1 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-267.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #147

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #148

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nitrogen
Constituent Phase:N mg/L, Ammonia as N
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:166 166
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.75
DO:2.38 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-325.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,866 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:No influent data.

Notes:  

Data Set #149

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:25–346
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)6820 - (-)400

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #150

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 7
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:26–60
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)757.1 - (-)271.4

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.94
DO:2.41–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19–21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–482.2 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332–2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with the same effluent.

Data Set #151

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:25–346
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):(-)6820 - (-)400

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #152

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-380.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #153

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 346
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-6820.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #154

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 350
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration6
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-5733.33

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #155

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:25 25
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -400.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #156

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sodium
Constituent Phase:Na, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:24 24
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -380.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #157

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:69
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-76.92

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #158

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 39
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:66
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-69.23

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #159

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.38

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #160

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 28
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):91.07

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #161

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 68
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-74.36

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #162

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 66
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration39
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-69.23

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #163

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 29
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 91.38

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #164

Constituent Information

Constituent: Nickel
Constituent Phase:Ni, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:5 U 5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 28–30
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 91.1 - 91.7

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.55
DO:1.95–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)303.4–(-)247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:22.5–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #165

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.478
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:22
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-4502.51

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.94
DO:
Water Temperature:16.34 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:477.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,610 µS/cm
Other Parameters:42.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #166

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.1 U
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:72.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #167

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 72.3
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration0.1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #168

Constituent Information

Constituent: Phosphorus
Constituent Phase:P mg/L, Orthophosphate as P
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:15.3 15.3
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 0.28
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -5364.29

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.81
DO:0.1 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-267.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #169

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 7,300
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1,840
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)-296.74

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #170

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2,050 2,050
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): -57.69

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.55
DO:2.79 mg/L
Water Temperature:16.81 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,207 µS/cm
Other Parameters:28.3 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #171

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #172

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:
DO:
Water Temperature:
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #173

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 112
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.75
DO:2.38 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-325.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,866 µS/cm
Other Parameters:23.5 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #174

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):98.84

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #175

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 252
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.60

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #176

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 255
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:74
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):70.98

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #177

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.59

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #178

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 74
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration255
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)70.98

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #179

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 1
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration252
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)99.60

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes:  

Data Set #180

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:3 3
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 258
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 98.84

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #181

Constituent Information

Constituent: Lead
Constituent Phase:Pb, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:1 U 1 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 122–212
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 99.6 - 99.8

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): > 99%
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.10–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)247.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–7,172 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Y
Performance Metrics:Acute and chronic ambient water quality standards
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent under the detection limit.

Data Set #182

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,500
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:350
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):86.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.85
DO:2.41 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404 µS/cm
Other Parameters:27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #183

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,600
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:750
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):53.13

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #184

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 970
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2,000
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)51.50

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.81
DO:0.1 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-267.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #185

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfate
Constituent Phase:Sulfate (SO42-) mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:350 350
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2,500
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 86.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #186

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,860
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:4,490
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-141.40

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.93
DO:3.87 mg/L
Water Temperature:15.19 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:476.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:1,332 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #187

Constituent Information

Constituent: Total Dissolved Solids
Constituent Phase:TDS mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1,300
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:2,050
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):-57.69

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.8
DO:2.19 mg/L
Water Temperature:25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #188

Constituent Information

Constituent: Sulfide
Constituent Phase:Sulfide mg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:23 23
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.81
DO:0.1 mg/L
Water Temperature:20.21 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-267.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:6,424 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #189

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: U = under the detection limit. A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #190

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.3
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):89.13

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: U = under the detection limit.

Data Set #191

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):90.00

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81–2.85
DO:2.41–6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:21.72–25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:382.6–490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,404–2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–27.1 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #192

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):86.11

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.72–2.8
DO:2.19–3.92 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.47–25.14 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:482.2–492.7 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,218–3,394 µS/cm
Other Parameters:26–43.7 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events.

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect more than one day with the same influent.

Data Set #193

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)80.00

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:17.84 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-274.4 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154 µS/cm
Other Parameters:46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #194

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)86.1 - 89.1

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #195

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 2.5
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 90.00

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17
DO:0.04 mg/L
Water Temperature:19.65 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:-152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #196

Constituent Information

Constituent: Thallium
Constituent Phase:Tl, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:0.5 U 0.5 U
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 1.8–2.3
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): 86.1 - 89.1

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Effluent
pH:6.17–6.81
DO:0.04–4.34 mg/L
Water Temperature:14.5–21.09 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:(-)325.7–(-)152.5 mV
Specific Conductivity:5,154–8,162 µS/cm
Other Parameters:NA–46.4 %DO

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:The number of sampling dates was reduced, resulting in less info to determine long-term treatment effectiveness.
Limitations to data found:Total metals data set is limited to only two sampling events. All effluent values below the detection limit

Notes: A range of values is shown to reflect multiple days with effluent below the detection limit.

Data Set #197

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, total µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 71,000
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:620
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.13

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:  
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:   
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported):  
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Influent
pH:2.81
DO:6.48 mg/L
Water Temperature:25 °C
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:490.9 mV
Specific Conductivity:2,267 µS/cm
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Data not provided
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): Data not provided
Performance Metrics:Data not provided
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:The Chitorem/BCR3 treatment provided the best overall treatment performance for both metal removal and sustaining sulfate reducing conditions.
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:Substrate: sawdust, wood chips, compost, dairy manure and limestone chips. BCR substrate composition was modified due to a shortage of available manure and limestone. The shortage of manure and limestone may have had a negative impact on treatment effectiveness in the BCRs.
Other performance details:Data not provided
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes:  

Data Set #198

Constituent Information

Constituent: Zinc
Constituent Phase:Zn, dissolved µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):N

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 69,100
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:40
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):99.94

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration:  
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):

Max