State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Starcrest Professional Drycleaners, Sunrise, Florida
Description
|
Drycleaning using PCE was conducted at this site from March 1972 until May of 1995. The shopping center in which the drycleaning operation was located was razed in 1999/2000. Under a voluntary cleanup, approximately 20 inches of soil was excavated from beneath the floor slab of the bay that formerly housed the drycleaning operation. The former location of the bay that housed the drycleaning operation is now a parking lot for the new shopping center. Remediation Status: In groundwater monitoring |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 2,640 ppb | |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | 2,730 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 648 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | 4,600 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 152 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | soil | 96.1 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 16.4 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | 409 ppb | |
Vinyl Chloride | groundwater | 30.2 ppb | |
Vinyl Chloride | soil | 41.4 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 100ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | Plume Length: 220ft Plume Width: 130ft Plume Thickness: 95ft |
|
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 5.43ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
fine-grained sand with shells Depth: 0-3ft bgs 3ft thick Conductivity: 131.5ft/day Gradient: 0.00155ft/ft |
||
silty fine-grained sand with organics and shells Depth: 3-6ft bgs 3ft thick |
||
sandy, weathered limestone Depth: 6-9ft bgs 3ft thick |
||
silty, fine-grained san Depth: 9-60ft bgs 51ft thick |
||
fine-grained sand with shell Depth: 60-68ft bgs 8ft thick |
||
fine-grained sand with limestone lenses Depth: 68-71ft bgs 3ft thick |
||
dense limestone Depth: 71-115ft bgs 44ft thick |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
||
Additional VI Information: |
Soil source area at the site was excavated and removed. |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Groundwater: PCE = 3 µg/L; TCE = 3 µg/L; cis 1,2-DCE = 70 µg/L; trans 1,2-DCE = 100 µg/L; vinyl chloride = 1 µg/L Soil: PCE = 30 µg/kg; TCE = 30 µg/kg; cis 1,2-DCE = 400 µg/kg; trans 1,2-DCE = 700 µg/kg; vinyl chloride = 7 µg/kg |
|
Remedy Level: |
Interim Action |
Technologies
In Situ Bioremediation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Soil Removal |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$137,400 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
Monitoring: $ 6,500/year | |
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
Lessons Learned
1. A modified active soil gas survey is a good tool for locating contaminant source areas at drycleaning sites, particularly at sites where the building that housed the drycleaning operation has been razed and little is known concerning the former locations of equipment, waste storage areas and historical waste disposal areas. 2. Considerable contaminant mass was sorbed onto organic material in the organic-rich sand that occurs at 6-9 ft bgs. Removal of most of this material has resulted in substantial decreases in contaminant concentrations in groundwater at the site. |
Contacts
Aaron Cohen Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Cleanup, MS 4500 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8974 Aaron.Cohen@dep.state.fl.us Contractor: Steve Folsom, P.E. H.S.A. Engineers & Scientists 4019 East Fowler Avenue Tampa, Florida 33617-2008 Phone: (813) 971-3882 E-mail: Sfolsom@hsa-env.com |
Site Specific References
1. Contamination Assessment Report - December 2005 2. Interim Source Removal Plan - November 2004 3. Interim Source Removal Report - January 2006 4. Groundwater Monitoring Reports 2006 - 2008 |