Search Result
PHYTOREMEDIATION STRATEGIES FOR THE RECLAMATION OF TAILINGS AND MINING SOILS IN AN ACTIVE OPEN-PIT SITE
Diaz, A.M., R. Forjan, J.L.R. Gallego, L. Benavente-Hidalgo, A. Sanchez-Poyal, P. Diaz-Garcia, J.M. Menendez-Aguado and D. Baragano.
Environmental Research 275:121464(2025)
Filed Under: Research
Filed Under: Research
Two phytoremediation strategies were evaluated at an active open-pit mining site within a dunite deposit, an ultramafic igneous rock rich in nickel. Strategies included phytostabilization for tailings and phytoextraction for mining soil, composed of natural soil aggregates mixed with fine dunite fragments. Tailings had an alkaline pH (8.8), low organic matter content (9.4 g/kg), and high available Ni concentrations, requiring immobilization using compost, vermicompost, biochar, and vermichar. Amendments were tested in 1-kg pots over 180 days, assessing soil properties, plant growth, and Ni accumulation in Lolium perenne L. Mining soil showing a more neutral pH (7.6), higher organic matter (106 g/kg), and high available Ni contents underwent phytoextraction supported by EDTA and citric acid in a parallel experiment. Phytostabilization with compost, vermicompost, and vermichar significantly reduced available Ni (<5 mg/kg), improved plant growth, and increased labile carbon, while biochar was less effective. Vermicompost proved particularly beneficial, enhancing nutrient and carbon availability, minimizing Ni leaching, and preventing excessive accumulation in plant aerial parts. Phytoextraction was successfully implemented without altering soil properties, with EDTA boosting Ni accumulation in aerial biomass up to 400 mg/kg, outperforming citric acid. Findings highlight the adaptability of phytoremediation, demonstrating the successful application of both strategies in the same environment, with Lolium perenne L. functioning either as a metal accumulator or a phytostabilizing plant depending on the amendments used. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935125007157/pdfft?md5=0d1c4144fcf31a18f4d03b4a7e8b125f&pid=1-s2.0-S0013935125007157-main.pdf
Environmental Research 275:121464(2025)
Filed Under: Research
Filed Under: Research
Two phytoremediation strategies were evaluated at an active open-pit mining site within a dunite deposit, an ultramafic igneous rock rich in nickel. Strategies included phytostabilization for tailings and phytoextraction for mining soil, composed of natural soil aggregates mixed with fine dunite fragments. Tailings had an alkaline pH (8.8), low organic matter content (9.4 g/kg), and high available Ni concentrations, requiring immobilization using compost, vermicompost, biochar, and vermichar. Amendments were tested in 1-kg pots over 180 days, assessing soil properties, plant growth, and Ni accumulation in Lolium perenne L. Mining soil showing a more neutral pH (7.6), higher organic matter (106 g/kg), and high available Ni contents underwent phytoextraction supported by EDTA and citric acid in a parallel experiment. Phytostabilization with compost, vermicompost, and vermichar significantly reduced available Ni (<5 mg/kg), improved plant growth, and increased labile carbon, while biochar was less effective. Vermicompost proved particularly beneficial, enhancing nutrient and carbon availability, minimizing Ni leaching, and preventing excessive accumulation in plant aerial parts. Phytoextraction was successfully implemented without altering soil properties, with EDTA boosting Ni accumulation in aerial biomass up to 400 mg/kg, outperforming citric acid. Findings highlight the adaptability of phytoremediation, demonstrating the successful application of both strategies in the same environment, with Lolium perenne L. functioning either as a metal accumulator or a phytostabilizing plant depending on the amendments used. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935125007157/pdff
The Technology Innovation News Survey welcomes your comments and
suggestions, as well as information about errors for correction. Please
contact Michael Adam of the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund and Emergency Management at adam.michael@epa.gov or (703) 603-9915
with any comments, suggestions, or corrections.
Mention of non-EPA documents, presentations, or papers does not constitute a U.S. EPA endorsement of their contents, only an acknowledgment that they exist and may be relevant to the Technology Innovation News Survey audience.



